Charlene Koonce

Koonce, Cort Thomas’ partner in their firm Brown Fox Law PLLC, has become a central figure as Cort’s representative in the courts for the SEC vs. Barton Case. As an alumna of Abilene Christian University—a university from which Judge Brantley Starr graduated in earlier years—Koonce’s professional trajectory intersects significantly with that of Judge Starr. This connection, along with shared affiliations, has raised serious questions about impartiality in the case. Koonce, alongside the court-appointed receiver Cort Thomas, has been accused of turning the receivership process into a punitive weapon. Her actions include suing Timothy Barton’s family, barring him from mediation and settlement talks, and implementing a series of controversial measures that have caused severe financial harm and legal strain.

Koonce is the author of Weapons of a Receiver“, a paper presented at a legal conference that outlines the tactics a receiver can employ. As indicated from the title, what can a defense expect from her? In the Barton case, she has pursued aggressive and punitive measures, initiating what many have called malicious prosecutions, fully supported by Judge Starr. Going to the extent to sue Barton’s Lawyers, Children, Ex Wife, past employees and potentially everyone close to Timothy Barton, showcasing the extent of her legal maneuvers.

Supported by Judge Starr, Koonce has been accused of taking actions that exceed the bounds of standard legal practices, further intensifying the controversy surrounding the case. Koonce’s role in the Barton case has been characterized by aggressive tactics, including liquidating assets through fire sales and initiating lawsuits against Barton’s children, lawyers, and entities.